"Documentary about brain research including brain implant in Norway in the 60's on behalf of the U.S. Military, Air-force, Army, Navy and the C.I.A. The research was done on unwitting patients without any kind of consent. Shortened version of a Norwegian TV Documentary."
[00:55] The U.S.
Military used Norwegian patients in brain research projects.
[02:05] …the government
implants wires into people’s heads to remote control.
[13:23] …He (Sem-Jacobsen) had 82 different patients at Gaustad
that received implants that induced stimulation. They experienced the following
symptoms:
Altered state of mind: (56 subjects) Unconciousness, seisures,
reduced awareness.
Altered tactile: … (31 subjects) Temporary mute, changed pitch of
voice. (4 subjects) Altered sense of tatste.
Altered bodily functions: (47 subjects) Changed in respiration,
coughing, sweat, nausea. (5 subjects) Changed memory. (43 subjects) Different
hallucinations.
[14:00] The goal was to
find out how to change human behaviors.
[16:47] …He (Sem-Jacobsen) received the main funding from the Ford
Foundation—a foundation that for many years was used to camouflage funding from
the C.I.A.
How US
cover stories are keeping a Cold War weapon
and illegal human testing secret
Abstract:Since the 1950s, allegations of government mind
control weapons (now called neuroweapons) and nonconsensual human
experimentation and targeting have been dismissed as science fiction. However,
with a closer look at the history and science of neuroweapons and neuroscience,
an extremely alarming discovery becomes obvious: compelling new evidence
supports that secret neuroweapons are highly likely to already be developed.
This article discusses how and why nearly all experts were misled and therefore
were completely wrong about neuroweapons, resulting in disasterous
consequences. It describes two US Cold War cover stories (the official
explanations given to disguise secret US programs) that have become obsolete.
It argues that the public should be warned about the very real danger of secret
US neuroweapons and a thorough impartial investigation of the allegations
should also be conducted.
Terms and definitions (用語注釈): For this paper, the term electromagnetic
radiation (EMR) is used interchangeably with frequencies, radio-frequency (RF),
radio signals, radio waves, microwaves, microwave signals, low- frequency,
extremely low frequency (ELF), ELF frequencies, EM fields, beam weapons,
directed energy weapons. 1. Introduction
The US atomic bomb
exploded and the world discovered the existence of a formidable secret weapon.
By contrast, this paper will illustrate that there is proof that
neuroweapons (mind control weapons developed during the Cold War) are another
formidable weapon.[神経兵器、つまり冷戦中に開発されたマインドコントロール兵器は(核兵器と並ぶ)もうひとつのおぞましい兵器である証拠がある。] However, their
power lies partly in keeping them secret so they can be used surreptitiously.[神経兵器は、不正な使用ができるよう、その存在が秘匿され続けてこそ威力を発揮できる面がある。]In principle, the science is possible to target
and influence a person remotely and governments have been conducting secret
research to develop neuroweapons. Based largely on the science of
electromagnetic radiation (EMR),such weapons could be used to stop a
person or many people by influencing their behaviors by manipulating various
physical and psychological parameters related to brain functions; this could
change how wars are fought. Shrouded in secrecy, few people have even
heard of neuroweapons. Nevertheless,their importance has often been
compared to the atomic bomb and a brief summary of the significant
amount of obscure information is presented below. … As mentioned above, the
first cover story is that secret neuroweapons are still science fiction. The
second cover story concerns the official US policy on EMR bioeffects; it being
that there are no proven effects of EMR other than heating. For example,
most people know how a microwave oven works; the microwaves produce a thermal
effect and heat or cook food as in a microwave oven.
1.1 Neuroweapons
…The third US state tool is the neuroweapons program; neuroweapons
are considered a weapon of mass destruction. For example, in 2012, Russian
president Vladimir Putin described a new military program to develop EMR
weapons that target the nervous system: “Such high tech weapons systems will be
comparable in effect to nuclear weapons, but will be more acceptable in terms
of political and military ideology.” In 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev, the
Soviet leader at the time, described EMR weapons that could be used as
antipersonnel weapons, calling them “no less dangerous than mass strike weapons.”Gorbachev stated that the Soviet Union had not and would not test or
deploy such weapons. Since the 1940s, the Soviet Union has been studying how
EMR interacts with the human body and brain—called EMR bioeffects— and the US
has monitored the research to find out if there was any possible advantage
gained by the Soviets for espionage or weapons.
…The goal of the US
neuroweapons program is to develop the capability of remotely targeting, communicating
with and influencing a person’s brain. It is a weapon of surveillance,
influence and control. US government publications on future weapons indicate
that some neuroweapons are based on the science of EMR which allows for two
main weapons capabilities, first; in principle, EMR can be utilized as the
most likely method for remote human surveillance, similar to radar that
utilizes EMR to track objects such as airplanes or cells phones. As shown
below, in principle, this capability is possible but it is not known in
unclassified research.
Secondly, EMR
bioeffects can cause symptoms such as nausea, disorientation or confusion. In
principle, this capability can also be developed to include precise mind
control, including forcing someone to carry out certain specific tasks,
however it is unreported in unclassified science.
3.1 Bioelectricity and
the neuron doctrine
…In his 2013 state of
the union address, President Obama proposed a Brain Mapping Project which is
based on the neuron doctrine and the connectionist model.
6. Conclusions and
recommendation
…US secrecy methods
surrounding this research have included active deception, spreading
disinformation, distorting and suppressing science research, covering up
promising research and withholding funding from scientists with an interest in
the area of research. By keeping the science from developing in the
unclassified realm, the US government can cite mainstream science literature
and claim neuroweapons are not possible, thus completely nullifying any opposing
opinions. In this way, the US government breached its trust with the public
by classifying and monopolizing whole areas of science as well as neuroweapons.
…Today it can be
shown that neuroweapons are not science fiction. This is why further research
and investigation is called for; the alleged mind control victims deserve a
fair and impartial hearing, as it is highly possible that secret US
neuroweapons are more likely than not already successfully developed.