Friday, March 9, 2012

ギャングストーキング/マインドコントロール犯罪訴訟 TORJMAN vs FBI, CIA, USA, et al





935 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest

Washington, DC 20535-0001;


Office of Public Affairs

Washington, D.C. 20505;


9800 Savage Road, Suite 6711

Fort Meade, MD 20755-6711;


600 E Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20530;


1400 Defense Pentagon

Washington, DC 20301-1400;


1000 Independence Ave

Washington, DC 20585;



1. Plaintiff, Mireille Torjman hereby brings this action for injunction relief, damages, and tort damages, FOIA, and the right of review, based on personal knowledge and belief, as a victim and expert witness, to the serious information provided, as to all other matters, as to which allegations Plaintiff, without doubt or delusion, will provide proof, un-refuted evidence, overwhelming evidentiary support, witnesses, substantial facts, documents, videos, records, research, and investigation that exists and disclosed to the press by NSA on item ¶ 15, and as follows:

2. This case is about the wiretapping, surveillance, civil rights violations, privacy, communications technology, and crimes of humanity, in use by the Intelligence Community. With the advanced technology unknown to most, of shadow network of surveillance and spying, including, defendants are, transmitting, storing, tampering, and blocking or intercepting the content of a significant portion of the Plaintiff’s phone calls, emails, instant messaging, text messaging, Internet, Skype, electronic and wireless communications, and other communications harassment, both internationally and domestic, including Plaintiff’s family and practically every American, for the past 4 years, beginning on or about January 2007.

3. Plaintiff’s records will show communications are intercepted, manipulated, tampered with, stored, (data mining), harassed, and impeded. Plaintiff will provide numerous and countless, emails hijacked, fabricated, UNREAD, manipulated, deleted, including mail UPS, facsimile, and internet manipulations, since 2007. Plaintiff’s numerous impeded electronic communications with all her service providers were debilitating to her work and she had no resolve available from providers who were unable to detect or correct the situations. This includes manufactured emails, phone calls, and government employee’s unwitting involvement. In 2008, Plaintiff was also accused legally of false communications during her service with Qwest, by using wiretapped calls and disconnects to create false records with her utilities company, including defamation to her character.

On information and belief, Whistle Blower Kay Griggs, Military wife of former Chief of Staff Lt. Col, Black-Ops and underground she called“ Secret Societies”, was also harassed, impeded with and isolated, by “COMMUNICATION CHAOS“ tactics that she called mind jabbing ,cut and paste, with automobile sabotages, upon testifying, as same with Plaintiff’s various attempts and events.

4. Plaintiff is not delusional and has provided her records to DOJ in early 2009, with documents from many other credible sources and whistle blowers. Plaintiff requests that the Russell Tice case and Articles below underlined are read with disclosures being made as to her allegations, injunction relief, various separate counts, and tort damages throughout. Plaintiff has demonstrated courage, risked her reputation, risked her life, and family’s, and has been threatened, prior to receiving an anonymous email of the NSA article (below) in February 2009 and retaliated against. Plaintiff tried to blow the whistle to the DA late 2007, and was not aware what NSA was or government corruption, but knew she had to report what was going on; as quoted by Mr. Tice and others; “Statement by NSA, is “THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG and WIRETAPPING SURVEILLANCE LOOK LIKE SMALL POTATOES”. Most recently, Plaintiff was able to meet with the FBI in early 2010, and provided some information for investigation by various FBI analysts. Plaintiff was impeded to testify at a NY senate hearing in February 2009.

5. Plaintiff is suing defendants to enjoin their unlawful activities of all electronic communications, tangible and intangible and all allegations below and to require the inventory and destruction of those that have already been seized., and to obtain appropriate statutory, actual, and punitive damages, to deter future illegal activities. Plaintiff is also suing for injunctive relief, personal injury tort and damages, the right of review, and FOIA records.


51. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Title 5, 22, 42, 142, 18, 18a, and 50, Plaintiff Mireille Torjman brings this action on behalf of herself, and to attest to her family and the public’s victimization, unwittingly and/or unrealized at the hands of, the direction of, or the knowledge of the Defendants:

(a) TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 37 § 793. Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information,

(b) 18 U.S.C. § 241. Conspiracy against rights,

(c) 18 U.S.C. § 373. Solicitation to commit a crime of violence,

(d) 18 U.S.C. § 1091. Genocide,

(e) 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Mail fraud,

(f) 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant,

(g) 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant,

(h) 18 U.S.C. § 1583 (2). Enticement into slavery,

(i) 18 U.S.C. § 1692. Foreign mail as United States mail,

(j) 18 U.S.C. § 1801. Video voyeurism,

(k) 18 U.S.C. § 1812. Statement of exclusive means by which electronic surveillance and interception of certain communications may be conducted,

(l) 18 U.S.C. § 2242. Sexual abuse,

(m) 18 U.S.C. § 2332 (a) Terrorism, and (h). Use of weapons of mass destruction,

(n) 18 U.S.C. § 2339. Harboring or concealing terrorists,

(o) 18 U.S.C. § 2422. Coercion and enticement, or are currently doing so;

(p) Defendants have subjected the public to electronic surveillance, in violation of 50 U.S.C. § 1809 and 1810, or are currently doing so;

(q) Defendants are intercepting communications in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2510 and 18 U.S.C. § 2511;

(r) Defendants have transmitted Plaintiff and the public in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2703, Required Disclosure of communications records, or are currently doing so;

(s) Defendants have transmitted civilians, and non civilians, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2381. Treason, or are currently doing so;

(t) Defendants have harassed and transmitted the public to stalk and harass the Plaintiff inclusive of electronically and tangibly, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2261: US Code - 2261A: Stalking

(u) Plaintiff was violated with her civil rights with the use of electronic communications under 18a U.S.C. Rule 41. Search and Seizure

(v) Defendants have violated the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., or are currently doing so;

(w) Defendants have violated the constitutional principle of separation of powers, or are currently doing so;

(x) Defendants have Tortured Plaintiff, her family, and the public electronically in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2340A, or currently doing so:

(y) Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive, declaratory, and other equitable relief against defendants and freedom from spying activities;

(z) Defendants have Tortured Plaintiff, her family and the public electronically in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, or currently doing so:

(aa) Plaintiff is entitled to Civil Damages 18 U.S.C. § Rule 2520 in violations of her First, Third, Fifth, and Thirteenth Amendments; 18 U.S.C. § 2510, 18 U.S.C. § 2511, and 18 U.S.C. § 2512.

(ab) Plaintiff is entitled to Grants and Health Care Assistance as a victim in accordance to 22 U.S.C. § 2152: US Code - Section 2152: Assistance for victims of torture.

(ac) United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Crel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, G.A. res. 39/46, annex, 39 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 51) at 197, U.N. Doc. A/39/51 (1984), entered into force June 26, 1987; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc. A/810 at 71 (1948); International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, G.A. res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 9.99 U.N.T.S. 171, entered into force Mar. 23, 1976.

(ad) Defendants have Tortured Plaintiff, her family and the public and the prohibitions against torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment and the conspiracy to oppress, torture, rape, suppress, is a violation under 142 U.S.C.§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with United States Civil Rights.

(ae) Defendants have Tortured Plaintiff, her family and the public and the prohibitions against malicious intent to torture, rape privacy rights, brainwash, and enslave with severe psychological in-humane damages to one’s spirit, and libel is actionable under Tort Claims of damages found under civil and criminal trials.

(af) Plaintiff has made at least 2 requests to the FOIA and both dossiers were denied under the violation of 5 U.S.C. § 552; claims under and 18 U.S.C. § 2707 and 5 U.S.C. § 702

52. Adequacy: Plaintiff and family members are suffering great harm arising from Defendants’ violations of law, as alleged herein. Plaintiff intends to prosecute this action vigorously. Plaintiff hereby demands injunctive relief and damages.

            Reference:  MK ULTRA Mind Control Revealed - The True Story (1998)

1 comment:

n said...

上記の訴状は、物的証拠が取りにくい思考解読装置ならびに拷問/殺害/マインドコントロール用ハイテク凶器による危害、およびこれを隠蔽する目的で公権力が行なっている 集団ストーキング(COINTELPRO)工作活動について、FBI、CIAや合衆国などを相手どり、女性が訴訟を起こした際の訴状の一部。文中に列記された膨大な罪状がまさに圧巻である。

Editor's Note: The following lawsuit is in regard to the use of classified technology which includes the wireless (fMRI) brain scanning of the human brain, as well as the use of directed energy weaponry on American citizens.

The plaintiff, Ms. Mireille Torjman, is a target of such non consensual human experimentation, and documents much of the electronic warfare harassment that this author and myriad others targeted for such inhumane treatment are being subjected to by the U.S. Military Industrial Intelligence complex.

The U.S. Courts continue to avoid hearing such lawsuits (John St. Clair Akwei has been attempting to have his lawsuit against the NSA heard since 1991), because the plaintiffs are filing claims regarding the aforesaid complexes' use of classified technologies on their persons, which are being used to both torture and murder them.

The U.S. Courts are not equipped to deal with such lawsuits, since most of this technology remains classified and thus protected under the cover of National Security. Moreover, these lawsuits implicate the U.S. Intelligence community in what can only be described as the types of Orwellian crimes which the tyrannical leadership of other nations have been condemned for throughout the ages.

Most of the plaintiffs in the community of TI's (Targeted Individuals) in the United States, have accused the U.S. Federal Government of utilizing the type of wireless thought reading and manipulation of one's thoughts that could only be accomplished on such a large scale through the use of a national brain fingerprinting program.(cont’d)

"The Mother Of All Black Ops"