Misled
and betrayed:
How US
cover stories are keeping a Cold War weapon
and illegal human testing secret
Abstract: Since the 1950s, allegations of government mind
control weapons (now called neuroweapons) and nonconsensual human
experimentation and targeting have been dismissed as science fiction. However,
with a closer look at the history and science of neuroweapons and neuroscience,
an extremely alarming discovery becomes obvious: compelling new evidence
supports that secret neuroweapons are highly likely to already be developed.
This article discusses how and why nearly all experts were misled and therefore
were completely wrong about neuroweapons, resulting in disasterous
consequences. It describes two US Cold War cover stories (the official
explanations given to disguise secret US programs) that have become obsolete.
It argues that the public should be warned about the very real danger of secret
US neuroweapons and a thorough impartial investigation of the allegations
should also be conducted.
Terms and definitions (用語注釈): For this paper, the term electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is used interchangeably with frequencies, radio-frequency (RF), radio signals, radio waves, microwaves, microwave signals, low- frequency, extremely low frequency (ELF), ELF frequencies, EM fields, beam weapons, directed energy weapons.
Terms and definitions (用語注釈): For this paper, the term electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is used interchangeably with frequencies, radio-frequency (RF), radio signals, radio waves, microwaves, microwave signals, low- frequency, extremely low frequency (ELF), ELF frequencies, EM fields, beam weapons, directed energy weapons.
The US atomic bomb
exploded and the world discovered the existence of a formidable secret weapon.
By contrast, this paper will illustrate that there is proof that
neuroweapons (mind control weapons developed during the Cold War) are another
formidable weapon.［神経兵器、つまり冷戦中に開発されたマインドコントロール兵器は（核兵器と並ぶ）もうひとつのおぞましい兵器である証拠がある。］ However, their
power lies partly in keeping them secret so they can be used surreptitiously.［神経兵器は、不正な使用ができるよう、その存在が秘匿され続けてこそ威力を発揮できる面がある。］In principle, the science is possible to target
and influence a person remotely and governments have been conducting secret
research to develop neuroweapons. Based largely on the science of
electromagnetic radiation (EMR), such weapons could be used to stop a
person or many people by influencing their behaviors by manipulating various
physical and psychological parameters related to brain functions; this could
change how wars are fought. Shrouded in secrecy, few people have even
heard of neuroweapons. Nevertheless, their importance has often been
compared to the atomic bomb and a brief summary of the significant
amount of obscure information is presented below.
… As mentioned above, the first cover story is that secret neuroweapons are still science fiction. The second cover story concerns the official US policy on EMR bioeffects; it being that there are no proven effects of EMR other than heating. For example, most people know how a microwave oven works; the microwaves produce a thermal effect and heat or cook food as in a microwave oven.
1.1 Neuroweapons
…The third US state tool is the neuroweapons program; neuroweapons are considered a weapon of mass destruction. For example, in 2012, Russian president Vladimir Putin described a new military program to develop EMR weapons that target the nervous system: “Such high tech weapons systems will be comparable in effect to nuclear weapons, but will be more acceptable in terms of political and military ideology.” In 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet leader at the time, described EMR weapons that could be used as antipersonnel weapons, calling them “no less dangerous than mass strike weapons.” Gorbachev stated that the Soviet Union had not and would not test or deploy such weapons. Since the 1940s, the Soviet Union has been studying how EMR interacts with the human body and brain—called EMR bioeffects— and the US has monitored the research to find out if there was any possible advantage gained by the Soviets for espionage or weapons.
…The goal of the US neuroweapons program is to develop the capability of remotely targeting, communicating with and influencing a person’s brain. It is a weapon of surveillance, influence and control. US government publications on future weapons indicate that some neuroweapons are based on the science of EMR which allows for two main weapons capabilities, first; in principle, EMR can be utilized as the most likely method for remote human surveillance, similar to radar that utilizes EMR to track objects such as airplanes or cells phones. As shown below, in principle, this capability is possible but it is not known in unclassified research.
Secondly, EMR bioeffects can cause symptoms such as nausea, disorientation or confusion. In principle, this capability can also be developed to include precise mind control, including forcing someone to carry out certain specific tasks, however it is unreported in unclassified science.
3.1 Bioelectricity and the neuron doctrine
…In his 2013 state of the union address, President Obama proposed a Brain Mapping Project which is based on the neuron doctrine and the connectionist model.
6. Conclusions and recommendation
…US secrecy methods surrounding this research have included active deception, spreading disinformation, distorting and suppressing science research, covering up promising research and withholding funding from scientists with an interest in the area of research. By keeping the science from developing in the unclassified realm, the US government can cite mainstream science literature and claim neuroweapons are not possible, thus completely nullifying any opposing opinions. In this way, the US government breached its trust with the public by classifying and monopolizing whole areas of science as well as neuroweapons.
…Today it can be shown that neuroweapons are not science fiction. This is why further research and investigation is called for; the alleged mind control victims deserve a fair and impartial hearing, as it is highly possible that secret US neuroweapons are more likely than not already successfully developed.
Full text available here:… As mentioned above, the first cover story is that secret neuroweapons are still science fiction. The second cover story concerns the official US policy on EMR bioeffects; it being that there are no proven effects of EMR other than heating. For example, most people know how a microwave oven works; the microwaves produce a thermal effect and heat or cook food as in a microwave oven.
1.1 Neuroweapons
…The third US state tool is the neuroweapons program; neuroweapons are considered a weapon of mass destruction. For example, in 2012, Russian president Vladimir Putin described a new military program to develop EMR weapons that target the nervous system: “Such high tech weapons systems will be comparable in effect to nuclear weapons, but will be more acceptable in terms of political and military ideology.” In 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev, the Soviet leader at the time, described EMR weapons that could be used as antipersonnel weapons, calling them “no less dangerous than mass strike weapons.” Gorbachev stated that the Soviet Union had not and would not test or deploy such weapons. Since the 1940s, the Soviet Union has been studying how EMR interacts with the human body and brain—called EMR bioeffects— and the US has monitored the research to find out if there was any possible advantage gained by the Soviets for espionage or weapons.
…The goal of the US neuroweapons program is to develop the capability of remotely targeting, communicating with and influencing a person’s brain. It is a weapon of surveillance, influence and control. US government publications on future weapons indicate that some neuroweapons are based on the science of EMR which allows for two main weapons capabilities, first; in principle, EMR can be utilized as the most likely method for remote human surveillance, similar to radar that utilizes EMR to track objects such as airplanes or cells phones. As shown below, in principle, this capability is possible but it is not known in unclassified research.
Secondly, EMR bioeffects can cause symptoms such as nausea, disorientation or confusion. In principle, this capability can also be developed to include precise mind control, including forcing someone to carry out certain specific tasks, however it is unreported in unclassified science.
3.1 Bioelectricity and the neuron doctrine
…In his 2013 state of the union address, President Obama proposed a Brain Mapping Project which is based on the neuron doctrine and the connectionist model.
6. Conclusions and recommendation
…US secrecy methods surrounding this research have included active deception, spreading disinformation, distorting and suppressing science research, covering up promising research and withholding funding from scientists with an interest in the area of research. By keeping the science from developing in the unclassified realm, the US government can cite mainstream science literature and claim neuroweapons are not possible, thus completely nullifying any opposing opinions. In this way, the US government breached its trust with the public by classifying and monopolizing whole areas of science as well as neuroweapons.
…Today it can be shown that neuroweapons are not science fiction. This is why further research and investigation is called for; the alleged mind control victims deserve a fair and impartial hearing, as it is highly possible that secret US neuroweapons are more likely than not already successfully developed.
http://issuu.com/
The Asian Human Rights Commission News page for September 25, 2013 features a review of this cover story by Cheryl Welsh here:
http://www.humanrights.asia/
Reference Video:
「私は人権活動家のシェリル・ウェルシュです。マインドコントロール犯罪の被害者です。アタマの中で声が聞こえたり、電化製品が外部から操作されたり、骨にコツッ、コツッとクリック音がしたり、思ったり感じたり見たりした内容が外部から読み取られたり・・」
ReplyDeleteシェリルは１９８０年代にマインドコントロール実験の標的（ターゲティッド・インディヴィジュアル、略して“TI”）にされ始めたと確信している。当時、陸軍の新兵募集事務所に立ち寄り、大学の奨学金がもらえる資格ができるかを問い合わせた。彼女は結局、志願しなかったのだが、それ以来、奇妙なマインドコントロール技術による現象が起こり始めたという。
「（今や）誰もが認めていることですが人の心というのは、電磁シグナルが神経を伝達することによって起こる電気的、化学物質的な活動に還元することができます。だから、このシグナルを機械で複製して外部から照射すれば、人の体内の電気シグナルの伝達を妨害したり干渉したりすることができるというわけなんですね」（シェリル）
That's Impossible「まさか！？」6-3（History Channel番組）
http://gangstalking-crime-databease.blogspot.com/2011/08/thats-impossible6-3history-channel.html
アメリカのハイテク凶器開発のための強制的人体実験に抗議するマインドジャスティス代表、Cheryl Welshさんが論文を出版されましたので、上記本文にてご紹介させていただきました。
ReplyDeleteなお下記の雑誌のウェッブサイトでもお読みいただけます。
Torture, Asian and Global Perspectives, Volume 2, Issue 2, June-August 2013, cover story on neuroweapons; Misled and betrayed: How US cover stories are keeping a Cold War weapon and illegal human testing secret by Cheryl Welsh, See Torture, Asian and Global Perspectives
このWelsh女史とは当方が大学のプロジェクトでインタビューさせていただいて以来、メールで交流を続けています。コインテルプロ（集団ストーカー犯罪）やハイテク凶器犯罪の被害に遭いながら法学の修士号の勉強を続けられた大変な努力家です。どうぞ彼女の論文をご覧になってあげてください (n)
Mental illness, right-wing conspiracies seen as volatile mix for Joshua and Sharyn Hakken -- The Tampa Bay Times,
ReplyDeleteSaturday, August 17
"We cannot safely return to the United States and are seeking political asylum in your country," the Hakkens wrote in a letter explaining their predicament to the Cuban government. They claimed to have uncovered a shocking fact through their engineering jobs: U.S. officials were secretly trying to control Americans' minds with chemicals spread from airplanes.
"After these discoveries … we were subjected to multiple attacks from our own government," the Hakkens wrote. "These attacks included surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA), hacking of our personal computers, microwave radiation weapons attacks, drugging of our food, false imprisonments and the kidnapping of our two small children."
The three-page letter was part of a cache of documents the Tampa Bay Times obtained last week after a judge ordered the disclosure of prosecutors' evidence — what attorneys call discovery material — in the Hakkens' criminal case.
Terrorism and Mental Health: The issue of psychological fragility
ReplyDeleteAmin A. Muhammad Gadit (Discipline of Psychiatry, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6 Canada. )
...it is possible to persuade subjects that their mind is being read; their intellectual property is being plundered and can even motivate suicide or murder. Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs) are another form of weaponry that is used to paralyze a victim with pain. According to Peter Philips, a scientist from USA, circumstances may soon arrive in which anti-war or human right protestors suddenly feel a burning sensation akin to touching a hot skillet over their entire body. Simultaneously they may hear terrifying nauseating screaming, which while not produced externally, fills their brains with overwhelming disruption. This new invention is dreadful addition to the armamentarium of weapons of abuse and torture. Manifestations of the effects of these occult weapons can mimic mental ill health and add further to the misery of the victims.
Here is a Norwegian TV 2000 documentary , The Race for the Brain, on neuroscientist Sem-Jacobsen and his implant research in the 1960s, with huge support of the US government. One document is a letter Sem Jacobsen wrote to the US govmt for funding, stating that in his hospital you don't need a patient's consent and they cannot sue! It has further great documentation on Sem Jacobsen's work with US space and aviation scientists, his large amount of US funding and his unusual access to US military bases all over the world, and his signficant work with the noted neuroscientist Wilder Penfield. The documentary makes a connection to Degado's work. This is a must see (Welsh).
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsXbv3bJFzs&client=mv-google&hl=en&guid=&gl=US&app=desktop
A letter from Dr. John R. Hall, D.O.
ReplyDeleteNON-CONSENSUAL EXPERIMENTATION WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
I am writing you on the behalf of victims both in the United States and abroad. As you are aware, many revelations surrounding the National Security Agency’s extensive electronic dragnet have recently come to light through released records by the intelligence insider Mr. Edward Snowden. During the course of the LIBE Committee hearings even more first-hand testimony was heard from other former NSA insiders regarding the extent of NSA privacy invasion and lack of oversight regarding their methods of data collection. Their statements begin to come very close to an issue that those of us in the medical community in the United States and abroad have been keenly watching for several years now.
(TBC)
cont'd
ReplyDeleteOver the last decade we have seen a sharp rise in the number of people coming forward with complaints of non-consensual experimentation with electromagnetic weapons designed to target both electronic hardware and the human central nervous system. While this was typically disregarded as mental illness in the past, the total global population voicing these identical complaints has exponentially grown to numbers that can no longer be attributed to delusional disorder, schizophrenia or any other described mental illness. You may be unaware that the safeguards against experimenting on the public without their consent in the United States are very lax and are included in legislation referred to as The Common Rule which is the Federal Policy regarding human subjects protection. It is written with several loopholes for the allowance of non-consensual experimentation, mostly by intelligence agencies. Hence, we have seen the necessity for the Bioethics Commission hearings in the United States after it was brought to light that Guatemalan prisoners were experimented on with contagions by the National Institutes of Health. During the course of the Bioethics Hearings, their directive was to determine if any other non-consensual experimentation was ongoing in the United States or abroad. At each of the four meetings there was included a public forum for the committee to address concerns by the public at large. Over one hundred individuals were in attendance at each of the four meetings voicing complaints of exposure and experimentation with electromagnetic weapons technologies. The effects of these technologies on the human body can only be described as torture.
cont'd
ReplyDeleteSeveral years ago another National Security Agency insider, John St. Clair Akwei, described in detail the frequencies used by the NSA and other intelligence agencies to access and influence the human body and nervous system in his civil action against the NSA. His descriptions of technologies used to track, monitor and alter a subject’s perceptions, moods and motor control are similar to the complaints we are hearing today from victims alleging non-consensual experimentation and torture. Moreover, Vladimir Putin, in a speech in 2012, admitted that Russia is following suit in funding development of weapons that will attack the human central nervous system. His defense minister, Anatoly Serdyukov, described the weapons as directed energy weapons, wave energy weapons, genetic weapons and psychotronic weapons based upon new physics principles. Obviously, Russia intends to go down the same path of directed energy weapons research that the United States has long been on. The unfortunate truth regarding this type of technology is the ease with which it can be used remotely and non-consensually on the public without the recommended safeguards of an Institutional Review Board or any appreciable ethical oversight. In the United States this research is typically done clandestinely under the guise of national security concerns just as the NSA electronic data mining was done which is currently being covered in the LIBE Committee.
cont'd
ReplyDeleteOver the last decade I have consulted with thousands of people in the United States complaining of exposure and experimentation with electromagnetic weapons technologies which include, but are not limited to, complaints of mood alteration, heart palpitations, involuntary body movements, severe headaches, blurred vision, burns to the skin, non-consensual micro-chipping and neurocognitive perturbation. It is my belief, based upon former and current publically released government research documents as well as victims complaints of torture, that this technology is being used in a non-consensual manner on the global public.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to you for meeting with our representative from the International Center Against Abuse of Covert Technologies and taking the time out of your busy schedule to hear these complaints and read my letter. On behalf of the whole of humanity, I sincerely hope that these technologies will eventually be addressed in the Subcommittee on Human Rights of the European Parliament, as the use of these currently can only be described as torture and dehumanizing.
Thank You,
Dr. John R. Hall, D.O.